- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs 3210 4G
AGM M9 vs Nokia 3210 4G
What M9 does better (0) and where 3210 4G wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is M9 better than 3210 4G?
M9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 3210 4G better than M9?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | — |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | — |
| Height | 141.3 mm | — |
| Width | 59 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 2 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
