- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs 105 4G 2023
AGM M9 vs Nokia 105 4G 2023
What M9 does better (4) and where 105 4G 2023 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.0
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9105 4G 2023
| M9 | 105 4G 2023 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 121.5 mm | +19.8 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm | +9 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 14.4 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 93 g | +38 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than 105 4G 2023?
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 111 ppi+50%
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
- Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 16.6%+29%
Why is 105 4G 2023 better than M9?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight131 g vs 93 g+41%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 14.4 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Colours | Black | Charcoal, Ocean Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | 16.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
