How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M6 vs 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024

AGM M6 vs Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024

What M6 does better (5) and where 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AGM M6
AGM · 2024M6
4.0Score
5 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024
3.5Score
2 advantages≈ $55
2.0Display2.0
2.2Battery2.1
5.4Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

M6105 4G 2nd Edition 2024
61.9 × 14219.850 × 121.514.4
M6105 4G 2nd Edition 2024Difference
Height142 mm121.5 mm+20.5 mm
Width61.9 mm50 mm+11.9 mm
Thickness19.8 mm14.4 mm+5.4 mm
Weight195 g93 g+102 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M6 better than 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024?

  1. Battery capacity2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+72%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  3. Pixel density167 ppi vs 111 ppi+50%
  4. Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+33%
  5. Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×

Why is 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 better than M6?

  1. Weight195 g vs 93 g2.1×
  2. Thickness19.8 mm vs 14.4 mm+38%
Specifications

Side by side

AGM M6AGM M6≈ $654.0
Design
Weight195 g93 g
Thickness19.8 mm14.4 mm
Height142 mm121.5 mm
Width61.9 mm50 mm
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
ColoursBlackBlack
Display
Screen size2.4″1.8″
PanelFarb-DisplayLCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px120 px
Resolution (height)320 px160 px
Pixel density167 ppi111 ppi
Screen-to-body ratio20.3%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107—
Chip makerUnisoc—
CPU cores1—
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity2,500 mAh1,450 mAh
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth5.15
USBUSB Type-C—
USB version22
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare