- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M6 vs T909c
AGM M6 vs Tel.Me. T909c
What M6 does better (3) and where T909c wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M6T909c
| M6 | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 142 mm | 129 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 61.9 mm | 44 mm | +17.9 mm |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 18 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 80 g | +115 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M6 better than T909c?
- Battery capacity2,500 mAh vs 600 mAh4.2×
- Memory card slotYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
Why is T909c better than M6?
- Weight195 g vs 80 g2.4×
- Thickness19.8 mm vs 18 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 142 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 61.9 mm | 44 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | — |
| Panel | Farb-Display | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 20.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,500 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
