How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Nokia 5310 (2020)
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Nokia 5310 (2020)

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the 5310 (2020) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the 5310 (2020)

Nokia 6310 (2021)
1
Nokia · 20216310 (2021)
3.5
14% cheaper ≈ $65
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 3
  • Screen-to-body ratio 32% vs 27.5%
  • Battery capacity 1,150 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • Dual SIM
Nokia 225 4G
2
Nokia · 2020225 4G
3.6
14% cheaper ≈ $65
  • RAM 0.062 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 3
  • Battery capacity 1,150 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • Weight 90 g vs 88 g
Nokia 6300 4G
3
Nokia · 20206300 4G
3.6
13% pricier ≈ $85
  • RAM 0 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • Bluetooth 4 vs 3
  • Weight 105 g vs 88 g
  • Screen-to-body ratio 25.6% vs 27.5%
ZTE Cymbal 2
4
ZTE · 2020Cymbal 2
3.7
14% cheaper ≈ $65
  • RAM 1 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Battery capacity 1,600 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Weight 135 g vs 88 g
  • Dual SIM
UleFone Note 8P
5
UleFone · 2020Note 8P
3.6
Same price ≈ $75
  • Battery capacity 2,700 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • RAM 2 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Screen size 5.5″ vs 2.4″
  • Weight 153 g vs 88 g
  • Dual SIM
UleFone Note 8
6
UleFone · 2020Note 8
3.6
Same price ≈ $75
  • Battery capacity 2,700 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • RAM 2 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Screen size 5.5″ vs 2.4″
  • Weight 153 g vs 88 g
ZTE Cymbal U
7
ZTE · 2021Cymbal U
3.7
Same price ≈ $75
  • RAM 1 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Battery capacity 1,600 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Dual SIM
  • Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
Energizer E282SC
8
Energizer · 2021E282SC
3.6
14% cheaper ≈ $65
  • RAM 0 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
  • Weight 101 g vs 88 g
Lava Z61 Pro
9
Lava · 2020Z61 Pro
3.7
Same price ≈ $75
  • Battery capacity 3,100 mAh vs 1,200 mAh
  • RAM 2 GB vs 0.008 GB
  • Screen size 5.4″ vs 2.4″
  • Weight 160 g vs 88 g
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare