5% pricier ≈ $80
- Battery capacity 1,800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 146 g vs 86 g
- Thickness 14.7 mm vs 13.1 mm
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- Nokia 3210
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Nokia 3210
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the 3210 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the 3210
7% cheaper ≈ $70
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Screen-to-body ratio 35.2% vs 28.1%
- Thickness 11.6 mm vs 13.1 mm
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
8% cheaper ≈ $70
- Battery capacity 1,800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 165 g vs 86 g
- Screen-to-body ratio 19.8% vs 28.1%
7% pricier ≈ $80
- Thickness 11.6 mm vs 13.1 mm
- Main camera 0.3 MP vs 2 MP
- Weight 90 g vs 86 g
Same price ≈ $75
- RAM 0 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Battery capacity 1,850 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- CPU frequency 1.5 GHz vs 1 GHz
- Weight 140 g vs 86 g
- Dual SIM
12% pricier ≈ $85
- Thickness 12.7 mm vs 13.1 mm
- Battery capacity 1,150 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 121 g vs 86 g
11% cheaper ≈ $70
- Thickness 12.7 mm vs 13.1 mm
- Battery capacity 1,150 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 119 g vs 86 g
Same price ≈ $75
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Screen-to-body ratio 36.5% vs 28.1%
- Thickness 10.9 mm vs 13.1 mm
- RAM 0.008 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
14% cheaper ≈ $65
- Battery capacity 2,100 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Weight 150 g vs 86 g
- Bluetooth 2.4 vs 5
13% pricier ≈ $85
- Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 169 g vs 86 g
- Thickness 20 mm vs 13.1 mm