9% cheaper ≈ $540
- Storage (base) 256 GB vs 512 GB
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Razr Ultra 2025 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Razr Ultra 2025
30% pricier ≈ $780
- Battery capacity 5,165 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Wireless charging power 50 W vs 30 W
- Main camera aperture f/1.7 vs f/1.8
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Peak brightness 3,200 nits vs 4,500 nits
53% pricier ≈ $920
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- Wired charging 80 W vs 68 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Selfie camera 20 MP vs 50 MP
105% pricier ≈ $1,250
- Battery capacity 5,820 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- Screen size 8″ vs 7″
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Selfie camera 20 MP vs 50 MP
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Wired charging 80 W vs 68 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- CPU frequency 3.3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz
55% pricier ≈ $930
- Telephoto camera
- Battery capacity 5,015 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Screen size 8″ vs 7″
- Wired charging 30 W vs 68 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
20% pricier ≈ $720
- Telephoto camera
- Weight 190 g vs 199 g
- Main camera aperture f/1.7 vs f/1.8
- Wireless charging
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
Same price ≈ $600
- Weight 188 g vs 199 g
- CPU cores 10 vs 8
- Thickness 6.5 mm vs 7.2 mm
- Wired charging 25 W vs 68 W
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
62% pricier ≈ $970
- Telephoto camera
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- Wired charging 80 W vs 68 W
- Wireless charging
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
73% pricier ≈ $1,050
- Telephoto camera
- Rear cameras 4 vs 2
- Weight 194 g vs 199 g
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Peak brightness 2,500 nits vs 4,500 nits