14% pricier ≈ $440
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- Wired charging 66 W vs 45 W
- Battery capacity 4,400 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- Wireless charging
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Motorola Razr+ 2025
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Razr+ 2025 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Razr+ 2025
42% pricier ≈ $540
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 256 GB
- Wired charging 68 W vs 45 W
- Active use (test) 15.2 h vs 10.6 h
- Telephoto camera
- Weight 199 g vs 189 g
56% pricier ≈ $600
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,433 vs 4,989
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Wired charging 25 W vs 45 W
- Telephoto camera
56% pricier ≈ $600
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 256 GB
- Wired charging 68 W vs 45 W
- Battery capacity 4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Telephoto camera
- Weight 199 g vs 189 g
4% pricier ≈ $400
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,265 vs 4,989
- Measured brightness 1,475 nits vs 1,220 nits
- Wired charging 25 W vs 45 W
- AnTuTu score 1,400,594 vs 1,794,400
37% pricier ≈ $530
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,108 vs 4,989
- Ultra-wide camera
- Measured brightness 1,444 nits vs 1,220 nits
- Wired charging 25 W vs 45 W
- AnTuTu score 1,355,845 vs 1,794,400
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 256 GB
- Wired charging 80 W vs 45 W
- Telephoto camera
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz
Same price ≈ $380
- Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Pixel density 439 ppi vs 413 ppi
- Resolution (width) 1,188 px vs 1,080 px
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
- Optical stabilisation
40% pricier ≈ $540
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- Active use (test) 12.1 h vs 10.6 h
- Measured brightness 1,265 nits vs 1,220 nits
- AnTuTu score 1,140,567 vs 1,794,400
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,441 vs 4,989
102% pricier ≈ $780
- Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 256 GB
- Battery capacity 5,165 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Wired charging 67 W vs 45 W
- Telephoto camera
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 165 Hz