How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Huawei Mate Xs 2
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Huawei Mate Xs 2

10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Mate Xs 2 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Huawei Mate Xs 2
Huawei · 2022
Mate Xs 2
7.8″Snapdragon 8884,600 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $2,150
6.0

Alternatives to the Mate Xs 2

Vivo X Fold3 Pro
1
Vivo · 2024X Fold3 Pro
9.3
Same price ≈ $2,150
  • AnTuTu score 2,066,322 vs 641,608
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,791 vs 3,131
  • Measured brightness 2,129 nits vs 725 nits
  • Memory card slot
  • 4K selfie video
OPPO Find N3
2
OPPO · 2023Find N3
7.8
18% cheaper ≈ $1,800
  • AnTuTu score 1,417,837 vs 641,608
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 5,166 vs 3,131
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Main camera 48 MP vs 50 MP
  • Memory card slot
Vivo X Fold+
3
Vivo · 2022X Fold+
8.5
27% cheaper ≈ $1,550
  • Optical stabilisation
  • Wireless charging
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3×
  • Weight 311 g vs 255 g
  • Memory card slot
Huawei Mate X6
4
Huawei · 2024Mate X6
7.4
Same price ≈ $2,150
  • AnTuTu score 1,298,127 vs 641,608
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Optical stabilisation
  • Memory card slot
  • CPU frequency 2.5 GHz vs 2.84 GHz
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
5
Honor · 2022Magic Vs Ultimate
6.6
25% cheaper ≈ $1,600
  • RAM 16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh
  • Main camera 54 MP vs 50 MP
  • Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Memory card slot
Honor Magic V
6
Honor · 2022Magic V
6.4
30% cheaper ≈ $1,500
  • Battery capacity 4,750 mAh vs 4,600 mAh
  • Selfie camera 42 MP vs 11 MP
  • CPU frequency 3 GHz vs 2.84 GHz
  • Telephoto camera
  • Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
7
Xiaomi · 2022Mix Fold 2
6.8
35% cheaper ≈ $1,400
  • AnTuTu score 1,050,139 vs 641,608
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Optical stabilisation
  • Battery capacity 4,500 mAh vs 4,600 mAh
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 3×
Honor Magic Vs
8
Honor · 2022Magic Vs
6.3
47% pricier ≈ $3,200
  • AnTuTu score 831,175 vs 641,608
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,971 vs 3,131
  • Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Memory card slot
Vivo X Fold
9
Vivo · 2022X Fold
8.0
35% cheaper ≈ $1,400
  • Optical stabilisation
  • Wireless charging
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3×
  • Weight 311 g vs 255 g
  • Memory card slot
OPPO Find N5
10
OPPO · 2025Find N5
9.2
5% pricier ≈ $2,300
  • AnTuTu score 2,274,385 vs 641,608
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,218 vs 3,131
  • Battery capacity 5,600 mAh vs 4,600 mAh
  • Memory card slot
  • Pixel density 412 ppi vs 424 ppi
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare