1
Maxcom · 2025MM835 4G
9% cheaper ≈ $70
- Weight 100 g vs 136 g
- Screen size 3.5″ vs 2.8″
- Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- HMD 2660 Flip
- Alternatives
Alternatives to HMD 2660 Flip
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the 2660 Flip — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the 2660 Flip
4% cheaper ≈ $75
- Weight 95 g vs 136 g
- Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Screen size 2.2″ vs 2.8″
4% cheaper ≈ $75
- RAM 1 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Main camera 2 MP vs 0.3 MP
- Battery capacity 1,850 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Dual SIM
- Weight 140 g vs 136 g
9% pricier ≈ $85
- RAM 0 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Main camera 2 MP vs 0.3 MP
- Battery capacity 1,850 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Dual SIM
- Process 28 nm vs 22 nm
9% pricier ≈ $85
- RAM 1 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Main camera 5 MP vs 0.3 MP
- Battery capacity 1,850 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Dual SIM
- Pixel density 125 ppi vs 143 ppi
4% pricier ≈ $80
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx8 vs IPx4
- Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 162 g vs 136 g
- Thickness 22.8 mm vs 19 mm
7
Nokia · 20262360 Flip
- Weight 121 g vs 136 g
- Screen-to-body ratio 39% vs 22.2%
- RAM 0.004 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Dual SIM
- Battery capacity 4,325 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- RAM 12 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Main camera 50 MP vs 0.3 MP
- Weight 193 g vs 136 g
- Memory card slot
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- RAM 16 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Main camera 200 MP vs 0.3 MP
- Weight 204 g vs 136 g
- Memory card slot
- Battery capacity 4,610 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- RAM 8 GB vs 0.062 GB
- Main camera 50 MP vs 0.3 MP
- Weight 187 g vs 136 g
- Memory card slot