How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Emporia PRIME-LTE
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Emporia PRIME-LTE

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the PRIME-LTE — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Emporia PRIME-LTE
Emporia · 2023
PRIME-LTE
2.3″1,400 mAh2 MP
approx. price≈ $55

Alternatives to the PRIME-LTE

Nokia 105 4G 2023
1
Nokia · 2023105 4G 2023
3.5
4% cheaper ≈ $50
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Weight 93 g vs 107 g
  • Screen size 1.8″ vs 2.3″
  • Resolution (width) 120 px vs 240 px
Nokia 150 (2023)
2
Nokia · 2023150 (2023)
3.5
23% pricier ≈ $65
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.3″
  • Thickness 15.2 mm vs 13 mm
Bea-Fon SL260 LTE
3
Bea-Fon · 2023SL260 LTE
6% pricier ≈ $55
  • Weight 90 g vs 107 g
  • Thickness 12.6 mm vs 13 mm
  • Battery capacity 800 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Screen size 2.2″ vs 2.3″
AGM M9
4
AGM · 2024M9
4.9
8% pricier ≈ $55
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.3″
  • Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Weight 131 g vs 107 g
Energizer E246SC
5
Energizer · 2024E246SC
Same price ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 2,000 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.3″
  • Thickness 21 mm vs 13 mm
Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024
6
3.5
Same price ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Weight 93 g vs 107 g
  • Screen size 1.8″ vs 2.3″
  • Resolution (width) 120 px vs 240 px
Panasonic KX-TU250
7
Panasonic · 2022KX-TU250
3.6
Same price ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.3″
  • Main camera 1 MP vs 2 MP
  • Thickness 15 mm vs 13 mm
HMD 110 4G
8
HMD · 2024110 4G
3.6
Same price ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Weight 94 g vs 107 g
  • Main camera 0.3 MP vs 2 MP
Panasonic KX-TU260
10
Panasonic · 2026KX-TU260
3.5
4% pricier ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,400 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.3″
  • Main camera 1 MP vs 2 MP
  • Weight 119 g vs 107 g
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare