How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Bea-Fon C90 LTE
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Bea-Fon C90 LTE

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the C90 LTE — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Bea-Fon C90 LTE
Bea-Fon · 2026
C90 LTE
1.8″1,000 mAh
approx. price≈ $40

Alternatives to the C90 LTE

Peaq PMP 92
1
Peaq · 2026PMP 92
Same price ≈ $40
  • Weight 60 g vs 67 g
  • Battery capacity 800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Thickness 15 mm vs 14 mm
Peaq PMP 12
3
Peaq · 2026PMP 12
16% cheaper ≈ $30
  • Weight 60 g vs 67 g
  • Battery capacity 800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Thickness 15 mm vs 14 mm
Nokia 123 Shield
4
Nokia · 2026123 Shield
3.6
13% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery capacity 1,750 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 1.8″
  • Resolution (width) 240 px vs 128 px
  • Weight 108 g vs 67 g
  • Thickness 15 mm vs 14 mm
TCL onetouch 4041
5
TCL · 2025onetouch 4041
Same price ≈ $40
  • Battery capacity 1,030 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Weight 80 g vs 67 g
  • Thickness 14.6 mm vs 14 mm
Bea-Fon SL230 LTE
6
Bea-Fon · 2025SL230 LTE
5% pricier ≈ $40
  • Thickness 12.6 mm vs 14 mm
  • Battery capacity 800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Weight 90 g vs 67 g
Panasonic KX-TU260
7
Panasonic · 2026KX-TU260
3.5
37% pricier ≈ $50
  • Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 1.8″
  • Resolution (width) 240 px vs 128 px
  • Weight 119 g vs 67 g
  • Dual SIM
Nokia 210 4G 2026
9
Nokia · 2026210 4G 2026
3.5
68% pricier ≈ $65
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 1.8″
  • Resolution (width) 240 px vs 128 px
  • Weight 93 g vs 67 g
HMD 130 Music
10
HMD · 2025130 Music
3.5
Same price ≈ $35
  • Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 1.8″
  • Resolution (width) 240 px vs 128 px
  • Weight 83 g vs 67 g
  • Thickness 14.8 mm vs 14 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare