- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Redmi Note 15 vs Z-Slim
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 vs ZEED Z-Slim
What Redmi Note 15 does better (10) and where Z-Slim wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display6.7
8.6Camera6.7
7.6Battery6.7
7.7Features9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi Note 15Z-Slim
| Redmi Note 15 | Z-Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 162.6 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 75.4 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 6 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 172 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi Note 15 better than Z-Slim?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Z-Slim: No
- Battery capacity5,520 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Z-Slim: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Z-Slim better than Redmi Note 15?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- eSIMNo · Redmi Note 15: Yes
- Weight178 g vs 172 g+3%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 32 MP+60%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 6 mm+23%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 162.6 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Black, Glacier Blue, Mist Purple | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,524 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 90.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 637,266 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,958 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 861 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,520 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 14.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
7.28.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
7.78.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A37vsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
8.68.6
vs
Vivo V70 Lite 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
8.88.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 4G
8.68.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Pova Curve 2
8.68.7


