- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Redmi K40 Pro vs Axon 20 4G
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro vs ZTE Axon 20 4G
What Redmi K40 Pro does better (10) and where Axon 20 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.1
8.2Camera7.3
7.0Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi K40 ProAxon 20 4G
| Redmi K40 Pro | Axon 20 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 172.1 mm | −8.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 198 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi K40 Pro better than Axon 20 4G?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Axon 20 4G: No
- Battery capacity4,520 mAh vs 4,220 mAh+7%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2 GHz+42%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%
Why is Axon 20 4G better than Redmi K40 Pro?
- Memory card slotNo · Redmi K40 Pro: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+4%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 32 MP+60%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 172.1 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Aurora | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 84.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Unisoc UMS512T / Tiger T618 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali G52 MP2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,520 mAh | 4,220 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 12 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPhone 13 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
8.17.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K40 ProvsSony Xperia 1 III
7.88.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K70 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
9.37.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K60 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
9.27.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K40 ProvsOPPO Reno7 Pro 5G
7.87.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K50 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
8.67.8