How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F7 vs nubia RedMagic 10S Pro

Xiaomi Poco F7 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 10S Pro

What Poco F7 does better (10) and where nubia RedMagic 10S Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F7
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7
9.3Score
10 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
9.3Score
14 advantages≈ $700
9.4Display9.7
8.8Camera8.9
8.6Battery9.3
9.3Features7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F7nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
77.9 × 163.18.276.1 × 163.48.9
Poco F7nubia RedMagic 10S ProDifference
Height163.1 mm163.4 mm−0.3 mm
Width77.9 mm76.1 mm+1.8 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight216 g229 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F7 better than nubia RedMagic 10S Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Peak brightness3,200 nits vs 2,000 nits+60%
  3. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  4. Weight216 g vs 229 g+6%
  5. Pixel density447 ppi vs 431 ppi+4%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.5 vs f/1.9+27%
  7. Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
  8. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
  9. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%
  10. Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,216 px+5%

Why is nubia RedMagic 10S Pro better than Poco F7?

  1. RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  3. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 7,050 mAh+8%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  5. CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+39%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F7: Yes
  8. Energy classB vs A
  9. Drop resistance classD vs C
  10. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  11. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  12. Endurance per cycle64 h vs 80 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F7Xiaomi Poco F7≈ $6209.3
Design
Weight216 g229 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm
Height163.1 mm163.4 mm
Width77.9 mm76.1 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)
ColoursBlack, White, Cyber SilverNightfall (Matt Black), Moonlight (Silver Transparent), Dusk (Black Transparent)
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,772 px2,688 px
Pixel density447 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness3,200 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness1,525 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.2%91.4%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.21 GHz4.47 GHz
GPUAdreno 825Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,024,751—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,402—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,476—
Memory
RAM12 GB24 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.5f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera20 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh7,050 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)14.8 h—
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min80%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-26.2 LUFS-24.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 2—
EU label
Energy classBA
Battery charge cycles1,0001,200
Endurance per cycle64 h80 h
Repairability classCC
Drop resistance classDC
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare