- dotrising.com
- Compare
- X70 vs Redmi Note 15 (China)
Wiko X70 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)
What X70 does better (5) and where Redmi Note 15 (China) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display9.0
5.9Camera5.5
8.2Battery8.1
4.7Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X70Redmi Note 15 (China)
| X70 | Redmi Note 15 (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.4 mm | 165 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 178 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X70 better than Redmi Note 15 (China)?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,100 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+5%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Redmi Note 15 (China) better than X70?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 3,200 nits2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- NFCNo · X70: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X70: Yes
- Wired charging40 W vs 45 W+12%
- Memory card slotNo · X70: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Weight182 g vs 178 g+2%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 7.4 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 161.4 mm | 165 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Kunlun Glass | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass |
| Colours | Gleam Black, Vein White, Impress Green | Black, White, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 89.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 @1 GHz | Adreno 710 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.88" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,100 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS-based | Android 15 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsXiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)
8.58.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)vsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.58.6
vs
Apple iPhone AirvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)
8.48.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)vsNothing Phone (3a)
8.58.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)vsNothing Phone (3a) Pro
8.58.6
vs
Honor 400 LitevsXiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)
8.38.5