- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Y200t vs Redmi Note 14 5G (China)
Vivo Y200t vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)
What Y200t does better (4) and where Redmi Note 14 5G (China) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display8.3
5.5Camera7.3
8.2Battery7.7
5.5Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Y200tRedmi Note 14 5G (China)
| Y200t | Redmi Note 14 5G (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.4 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Y200t better than Redmi Note 14 5G (China)?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,110 mAh+17%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Redmi Note 14 5G (China) better than Y200t?
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 2,100 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · Y200t: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Y200t: Yes
- NFCNo · Y200t: Yes
- Wired charging44 W vs 45 W+2%
- Memory card slotNo · Y200t: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Dark Green, Blue | Black, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 2,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 87.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,110 mAh |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)
8.58.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy C55vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)
8.48.2
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)vsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 (China)
8.27.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 (China)
8.26.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)vsTel.Me. T909
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)vsTel.Me. T909c


