- dotrising.com
- Compare
- X200T vs Phone Plinius
Vivo X200T vs Volla Phone Plinius
What X200T does better (15) and where Phone Plinius wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.5
9.3Camera7.5
9.5Battery7.9
9.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X200TPhone Plinius
| X200T | Phone Plinius | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 163 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10.5 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 230 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X200T better than Phone Plinius?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Phone Plinius: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Phone Plinius: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Phone Plinius: No
- NFCYes · Phone Plinius: No
- Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 5,300 mAh+17%
- CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+45%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- eSIMYes · Phone Plinius: No
- Weight203 g vs 230 g+13%
Why is Phone Plinius better than X200T?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 230 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10.5 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Core | — |
| Colours | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | — |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.63 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Mali G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,725,989 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,430 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,200 mAh | 5,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 90 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 1.09 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | OriginOS 6 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
