- dotrising.com
- Compare
- X200 Pro mini vs Phone Quintus
Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Volla Phone Quintus
What X200 Pro mini does better (18) and where Phone Quintus wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display7.9
9.3Camera6.8
9.1Battery3.2
9.3Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X200 Pro miniPhone Quintus
| X200 Pro mini | Phone Quintus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150.8 mm | 164.2 mm | −13.3 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 74.7 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X200 Pro mini better than Phone Quintus?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 980 nits4.6×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Battery capacity5,700 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+21%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Phone Quintus: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Phone Quintus: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Phone Quintus: No
- NFCYes · Phone Quintus: No
- CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+40%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 388 ppi+19%
Why is Phone Quintus better than X200 Pro mini?
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 150.8 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 71.8 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Pink | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,216 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 980 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,805 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 90.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.63 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Mali G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,779,129 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,705 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,665 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,700 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 90 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | OriginOS 5 (China) | — |
