- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V60 Lite 5G vs Redmi K80 Ultra
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
What V60 Lite 5G does better (2) and where Redmi K80 Ultra wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display9.7
5.3Camera9.0
9.2Battery9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
V60 Lite 5GRedmi K80 Ultra
| V60 Lite 5G | Redmi K80 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.1 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 219 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V60 Lite 5G better than Redmi K80 Ultra?
- Weight194 g vs 219 g+13%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+7%
Why is Redmi K80 Ultra better than V60 Lite 5G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Optical stabilisationNo · V60 Lite 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 7,410 mAh+14%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+45%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · V60 Lite 5G: Yes
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 447 ppi+15%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,280 px+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.8 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | Vitality Powder, Titanium Mist Blue, Midnight Black | Gray, White, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.8% | 90.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,926,668 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 9,174 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 7,410 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 15 | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsOPPO Find X8 Ultra
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsOnePlus Ace 6
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsOnePlus Ace 6T
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsXiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra
9.69.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsRealme GT7 (China)
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K80 UltravsXiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
9.69.3


