- dotrising.com
- Compare
- iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Poco M8 Pro
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro
What iQOO Z11 Turbo does better (16) and where Poco M8 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.4
9.4Performance6.8
9.2Camera7.9
9.6Battery9.1
9.3Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Z11 TurboPoco M8 Pro
| iQOO Z11 Turbo | Poco M8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.6 mm | 163.3 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 78.3 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 206 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Z11 Turbo better than Poco M8 Pro?
- AnTuTu score3,068,959 vs 817,2223.8×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,106 vs 3,2452.8×
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity7,600 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+17%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Peak brightness5,500 nits vs 3,200 nits+72%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+41%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco M8 Pro: No
Why is Poco M8 Pro better than iQOO Z11 Turbo?
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Charged in 30 min56% vs 75%+34%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.8% vs 89.6%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 157.6 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 78.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | White, Black, Blue, Pink | Black, Green, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,750 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 466 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,500 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,435 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.8% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 829 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,068,959 | 817,222 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,106 | 3,245 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,110 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,600 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.2 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -19.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 6 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 61 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro
9.08.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 ProvsXiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
9.07.2
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 ProvsXiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
9.07.6
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 ProvsInfinix Note 60
9.08.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.09.1
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 ProvsTecno Pova 8 Pro
9.09.0


