dotrising.com
Compare
iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Redmi K70 Pro

Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro

What iQOO Neo8 Pro does better (3) and where Redmi K70 Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2023iQOO Neo8 Pro

9.2Score

3 advantages≈ $460

Xiaomi · 2023Redmi K70 Pro

9.3Score

13 advantages≈ $460

Higher score

9.4Display9.2

8.6Performance9.1

8.9Camera8.8

7.8Battery7.8

8.7Features9.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo8 ProRedmi K70 Pro

	iQOO Neo8 Pro	Redmi K70 Pro	Difference
Height	164.7 mm	160.9 mm	+3.8 mm
Width	77 mm	75 mm	+2 mm
Thickness	8.5 mm	8.2 mm	+0.3 mm
Weight	192 g	209 g	−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo8 Pro better than Redmi K70 Pro?

Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Memory card slotYes · Redmi K70 Pro: No
Weight192 g vs 209 g+9%

Why is Redmi K70 Pro better than iQOO Neo8 Pro?

Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,000 nits3.1×
AnTuTu score1,920,379 vs 2,486,114+29%
RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo8 Pro: Yes
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,643 vs 7,192+27%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,675 vs 4,359+19%
Pixel density453 ppi vs 526 ppi+16%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro≈ $4609.2	Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro≈ $4609.3
Design
Weight	192 g	209 g
Thickness	8.5 mm	8.2 mm
Height	164.7 mm	160.9 mm
Width	77 mm	75 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Leather	Glass
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass
Colours	Red, Mint, Black	Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,260 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,800 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	453 ppi	526 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	4,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,016 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	87.5%	89%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 9200+	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.35 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Immortalis-G715 MC11	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	1,920,379	2,486,114
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,643	7,192
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,675	4,359
Memory
RAM	16 GB	24 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.49"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	120 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	167%	167%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	3.2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China)	HyperOS