- dotrising.com
- Compare
- iQOO Neo3 5G vs Redmi K40 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo3 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
What iQOO Neo3 5G does better (5) and where Redmi K40 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display7.9
6.5Camera8.2
4.8Battery4.2
7.9Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo3 5GRedmi K40 Pro
| iQOO Neo3 5G | Redmi K40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 163.7 mm | = |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 196 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo3 5G better than Redmi K40 Pro?
- Wired charging44 W vs 33 W+33%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40 Pro: No
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 58%+29%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi K40 Pro better than iQOO Neo3 5G?
- OLED panelNo · iQOO Neo3 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · iQOO Neo3 5G: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio84% vs 85.9%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Blue, Black/Dark Blue | Black, White, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84% | 85.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12 |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPhone 13 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
8.17.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K40 ProvsSony Xperia 1 III
7.88.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K70 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
9.37.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K60 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
9.27.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K40 ProvsOPPO Reno7 Pro 5G
7.87.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K50 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
8.67.8