How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo12 vs 17T Pro

Vivo iQOO Neo12 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

What iQOO Neo12 does better (5) and where 17T Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo12
Vivo · 2026iQOO Neo12
9.5Score
5 advantages≈ $620
vs
Xiaomi 17T Pro
Xiaomi · 202617T Pro
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
9.7Display9.7
8.8Camera9.8
9.6Battery9.8
9.3Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo1217T Pro
75.9 × 163.48.577.5 × 162.28.3
iQOO Neo1217T ProDifference
Height163.4 mm162.2 mm+1.2 mm
Width75.9 mm77.5 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness8.5 mm8.3 mm+0.2 mm
Weight225 g219 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo12 better than 17T Pro?

  1. Battery capacity9,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+29%
  2. Refresh rate185 Hz vs 144 Hz+28%
  3. Pixel density514 ppi vs 447 ppi+15%
  4. CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 4.21 GHz+9%
  5. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,280 px+12%

Why is 17T Pro better than iQOO Neo12?

  1. Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo12: Yes
  2. Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo12: Yes
  3. Peak brightness2,200 nits vs 3,500 nits+59%
  4. Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
  5. 4K selfie videoNo · iQOO Neo12: Yes
  6. eSIMNo · iQOO Neo12: Yes
  7. Weight225 g vs 219 g+3%
  8. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
  10. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
  11. Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO Neo12Vivo iQOO Neo12≈ $6209.5
Xiaomi 17T ProXiaomi 17T Pro≈ $5909.7
Design
Weight225 g219 g
Thickness8.5 mm8.3 mm
Height163.4 mm162.2 mm
Width75.9 mm77.5 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, Blue, GrayDeep Blue, Deep Violet, Black
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)3,200 px2,772 px
Pixel density514 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness2,200 nits3,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,069 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.8%91.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Mediatek Dimensity 9500
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.6 GHz4.21 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
AnTuTu score—2,795,030
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—9,766
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,939
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.31"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate—120 fps
Selfie camera16 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity9,000 mAh7,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—21.7 h
Wired charging100 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—72%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 17Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 7HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—71 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare