- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Jelly Star vs Poco C65
Unihertz Jelly Star vs Xiaomi Poco C65
What Jelly Star does better (3) and where Poco C65 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Camera4.6
2.0Battery3.1
5.6Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Jelly StarPoco C65
| Jelly Star | Poco C65 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95.1 mm | 168 mm | −72.9 mm |
| Width | 49.6 mm | 78 mm | −28.4 mm |
| Thickness | 18.7 mm | 8.1 mm | +10.6 mm |
| Weight | 116 g | 192 g | −76 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Jelly Star better than Poco C65?
- Weight116 g vs 192 g+66%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
Why is Poco C65 better than Jelly Star?
- Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.5×
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- Screen size3″ vs 6.7″2.2×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Thickness18.7 mm vs 8.1 mm2.3×
- Resolution (width)480 px vs 720 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 116 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 18.7 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 95.1 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 49.6 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 3″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 480 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 854 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | — | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 607 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 83.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 242,885 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,201 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.5 h |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 28% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -31.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
