dotrising.com
Compare
RugOne Xever 8 vs Poco M8 Pro

UleFone RugOne Xever 8 vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro

What RugOne Xever 8 does better (2) and where Poco M8 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.

UleFone · 2026RugOne Xever 8

6.0Score

2 advantages≈ $340

Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8 Pro

9.0Score

15 advantages≈ $320

Higher score

4.2Display9.4

6.8Camera7.9

3.2Battery9.1

6.5Features8.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

RugOne Xever 8Poco M8 Pro

	RugOne Xever 8	Poco M8 Pro	Difference
Height	168 mm	163.3 mm	+4.7 mm
Width	80 mm	78.3 mm	+1.7 mm
Thickness	14 mm	8.3 mm	+5.7 mm
Weight	320 g	206 g	+114 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is RugOne Xever 8 better than Poco M8 Pro?

Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Energy classA vs B

Why is Poco M8 Pro better than RugOne Xever 8?

Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
Peak brightness680 nits vs 3,200 nits4.7×
Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+38%
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
OLED panelNo · RugOne Xever 8: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · RugOne Xever 8: Yes
5GNo · RugOne Xever 8: Yes
Weight320 g vs 206 g+55%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · RugOne Xever 8: Yes
Pixel density395 ppi vs 447 ppi+13%
Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
Thickness14 mm vs 8.3 mm+69%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	UleFone RugOne Xever 8≈ $3406.0	Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro≈ $3209.0
Design
Weight	320 g	206 g
Thickness	14 mm	8.3 mm
Height	168 mm	163.3 mm
Width	80 mm	78.3 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	—	Black, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size	6.5″	6.8″
Panel	LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,280 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,772 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	447 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	680 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,435 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	—	89.6%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G200	Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip maker	Mediatek	Qualcomm
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	—	2.7 GHz
GPU	—	Adreno 810
AnTuTu score	—	817,222
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,245
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,110
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	—	512 GB
Storage (base)	—	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	—	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.6
Main sensor size	—	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	—	1080p
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	—	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	—	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	16.2 h
Wired charging	—	100 W
Charged in 30 min	—	75%
Wireless charging	No	No
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	—	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	—	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	—	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-19.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	—	Under display
Sensors	—	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	A	B
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	61 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A