- dotrising.com
- Compare
- T909c vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Tel.Me. T909c vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
What T909c does better (1) and where Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Display8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
T909cRedmi Note 13 Pro 4G
| T909c | Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 129 mm | 161.1 mm | −32.1 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 75 mm | −31 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 8 mm | +10 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 188 g | −108 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T909c better than Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?
- Weight80 g vs 188 g2.4×
Why is Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better than T909c?
- Battery capacity600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- OLED panelNo · T909c: Yes
- Thickness18 mm vs 8 mm2.2×
- Memory card slotNo · T909c: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · T909c: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · T909c: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 80 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 129 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | — | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Monochrome graphic | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | — | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,047 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 88.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 382,881 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,844 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | — | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | — | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | — | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 94% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 13 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
