- dotrising.com
- Compare
- T909c vs Redmi Note 12 Pro+
Tel.Me. T909c vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
What T909c does better (1) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro+ wins (7) — every spec side by side.
3.0Display7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
T909cRedmi Note 12 Pro+
| T909c | Redmi Note 12 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 129 mm | 162.9 mm | −33.9 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 76 mm | −32 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 8.9 mm | +9.1 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 208 g | −128 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T909c better than Redmi Note 12 Pro+?
- Weight80 g vs 208 g2.6×
Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro+ better than T909c?
- Battery capacity600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- OLED panelNo · T909c: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · T909c: Yes
- Thickness18 mm vs 8.9 mm2×
- Dual SIMNo · T909c: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · T909c: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 80 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 129 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | — | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Monochrome graphic | OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | — | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 990 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 86.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 498,710 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,208 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 629 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | — | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.6 h |
| Wired charging | — | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 158% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 12 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
