- dotrising.com
- Compare
- T909c vs V29 Pro
Tel.Me. T909c vs Vivo V29 Pro
What T909c does better (1) and where V29 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
T909cV29 Pro
| T909c | V29 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 129 mm | 164.2 mm | −35.2 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 74.4 mm | −30.4 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 7.5 mm | +10.5 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 188 g | −108 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T909c better than V29 Pro?
- Weight80 g vs 188 g2.4×
Why is V29 Pro better than T909c?
- Battery capacity600 mAh vs 4,600 mAh7.7×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- OLED panelNo · T909c: Yes
- Thickness18 mm vs 7.5 mm2.4×
- Dual SIMNo · T909c: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 80 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 129 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | — | Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Monochrome graphic | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | — | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 90.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 682,257 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,999 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | — | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | — | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 600 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | — | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 83% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.17 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 13 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
