How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. T909 vs Blade A35e

Tel.Me. T909 vs ZTE Blade A35e

What T909 does better (1) and where Blade A35e wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Tel.Me. T909
Tel.Me.T909
1 advantage
vs
ZTE Blade A35e
ZTE · 2025Blade A35e
4.5Score
4 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
3.0Display3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

T909Blade A35e
44 × 1092275.7 × 1648.6
T909Blade A35eDifference
Height109 mm164 mm−55 mm
Width44 mm75.7 mm−31.7 mm
Thickness22 mm8.6 mm+13.4 mm
Weight95 g185 g−90 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T909 better than Blade A35e?

  1. Weight95 g vs 185 g+95%

Why is Blade A35e better than T909?

  1. Battery capacity600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh8.3×
  2. Thickness22 mm vs 8.6 mm2.6×
  3. Memory card slotNo · T909: Yes
  4. Dual SIMNo · T909: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

ZTE Blade A35eZTE Blade A35e≈ $804.5
Design
Weight95 g185 g
Thickness22 mm8.6 mm
Height109 mm164 mm
Width44 mm75.7 mm
Colours3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/BlueSilvery Gray, Ice Green, Pink
Display
Screen size—6.5″
PanelMonochrome graphicLCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)—576 px
Resolution (height)—1,280 px
Pixel density—269 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—83%
Performance
Chipset—SC9863A
CPU cores—8
Memory
RAM—2 GB
Storage (max)—64 GB
Storage (base)—64 GB
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera—8 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Max video—1080p
Selfie camera—5 MP
Battery
Battery capacity600 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Ion—
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth—5.2
NFC—No
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
Software
OS at launch—Android 14
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare