- dotrising.com
- Compare
- T909 vs T909c
Tel.Me. T909 vs Tel.Me. T909c
What T909 does better (0) and where T909c wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
T909T909c
| T909 | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 109 mm | 129 mm | −20 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 44 mm | = |
| Thickness | 22 mm | 18 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 80 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is T909 better than T909c?
T909 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is T909c better than T909?
- Weight95 g vs 80 g+19%
- Thickness22 mm vs 18 mm+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 95 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 22 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 109 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 44 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Panel | Monochrome graphic | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 600 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
