- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Spark 40 Pro+ vs T909
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs Tel.Me. T909
What Spark 40 Pro+ does better (6) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
9.6Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark 40 Pro+T909
| Spark 40 Pro+ | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 109 mm | +54.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 44 mm | +31.8 mm |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 22 mm | −15.5 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 95 g | +65 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark 40 Pro+ better than T909?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 600 mAh8.7×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness6.5 mm vs 22 mm3.4×
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Spark 40 Pro+?
- Weight160 g vs 95 g+69%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Nebula Black, Aurora White, Moon Titanium, Tundra Green | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | — |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,601 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 455,013 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,903 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 378 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 10.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | HIOS 15.1 | — |
