- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Spark 30 Pro vs Y200t
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Vivo Y200t
What Spark 30 Pro does better (9) and where Y200t wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display6.9
5.9Camera5.5
6.0Battery8.2
5.5Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Spark 30 ProY200t
| Spark 30 Pro | Y200t | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 165.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 199 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Spark 30 Pro better than Y200t?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Y200t: No
- NFCYes · Y200t: No
- Peak brightness1,700 nits vs 1,000 nits+70%
- Memory card slotYes · Y200t: No
- Weight185 g vs 199 g+8%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8 mm+8%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Y200t better than Spark 30 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 5GNo · Spark 30 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging33 W vs 44 W+33%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min39% vs 43%+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Obsidian Edge, Arctic Glow, Magic Skin 3.0, Optimus Prime Edition | Dark Green, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,700 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 547,958 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,028 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 39% | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14.5 | OriginOS 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4GvsTecno Spark 30 Pro
7.27.1
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 1vsTecno Spark 30 Pro
7.17.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GvsTecno Spark 30 Pro
7.17.1
vs
Tecno Spark 40 ProvsTecno Spark 30 Pro
7.77.1
vs
Tecno Spark 30 ProvsTecno Spark 10 Pro
7.15.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy M15vsTecno Spark 30 Pro
7.17.1


