- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Pova Slim vs nubia Neo 3
Tecno Pova Slim vs ZTE nubia Neo 3
What Pova Slim does better (11) and where nubia Neo 3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display7.1
5.0Performance4.9
5.2Camera5.6
7.8Battery7.9
6.2Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova Slimnubia Neo 3
| Pova Slim | nubia Neo 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168.3 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 8.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Weight | 156 g | 209 g | −53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova Slim better than nubia Neo 3?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits4.5×
- OLED panelYes · nubia Neo 3: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight156 g vs 209 g+34%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 386 ppi+14%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Thickness6 mm vs 8.3 mm+38%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.1% vs 86.9%+3%
Why is nubia Neo 3 better than Pova Slim?
- Stereo speakersNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+16%
- AnTuTu score613,165 vs 639,225+4%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,988 vs 2,073+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · Pova Slim: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 156 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 6 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black | Shadow Black, Cyber Silver, Titanium Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 386 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,578 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 86.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 | Unisoc T8300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 613,165 | 639,225 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,988 | 2,073 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 61 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
