- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Pova 6 Pro vs V40 SE
Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Vivo V40 SE
What Pova 6 Pro does better (9) and where V40 SE wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display8.4
4.1Performance4.7
6.7Camera6.6
8.2Battery6.5
6.5Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 6 ProV40 SE
| Pova 6 Pro | V40 SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 163.2 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 186 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 6 Pro better than V40 SE?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Wired charging70 W vs 44 W+59%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V40 SE: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 60%+25%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is V40 SE better than Pova 6 Pro?
- AnTuTu score390,556 vs 569,252+46%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,890 vs 2,091+11%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,800 nits+38%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pova 6 Pro: Yes
- Measured brightness1,070 nits vs 1,196 nits+12%
- Weight198 g vs 186 g+7%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Comet Green, Meteorite Grey | Crystal Black, Leather Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,070 nits | 1,196 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.2% | 86.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 390,556 | 569,252 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | 2,091 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 373 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 14.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | Funtouch 14 |
