- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Camon 50 4G vs V70 Lite 5G
Tecno Camon 50 4G vs Vivo V70 Lite 5G
What Camon 50 4G does better (10) and where V70 Lite 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.5
8.2Camera7.3
8.5Battery8.5
5.8Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 4GV70 Lite 5G
| Camon 50 4G | V70 Lite 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.3 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 194 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 4G better than V70 Lite 5G?
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · V70 Lite 5G: No
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+18%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Memory card slotYes · V70 Lite 5G: No
- Weight172 g vs 194 g+13%
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 387 ppi+11%
- Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,080 px+12%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.7 mm+3%
Why is V70 Lite 5G better than Camon 50 4G?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- 5GNo · Camon 50 4G: Yes
- eSIMNo · Camon 50 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Charged in 30 min44% vs 58%+32%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 94.2%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | — |
| Colours | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 94.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 595,376 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,020 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, color spectrum, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 40 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
