- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Armor 34 Pro Pulse
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs UleFone Armor 34 Pro Pulse
What Camon 40 Pro 4G does better (8) and where Armor 34 Pro Pulse wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display6.6
9.1Camera7.2
7.9Battery9.1
5.8Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 40 Pro 4GArmor 34 Pro Pulse
| Camon 40 Pro 4G | Armor 34 Pro Pulse | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 183.1 mm | −18.7 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 86.8 mm | −12.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 32.7 mm | −25.4 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 825 g | −647 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 40 Pro 4G better than Armor 34 Pro Pulse?
- Weight178 g vs 825 g4.6×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 34 Pro Pulse: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 34 Pro Pulse: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 32.7 mm4.5×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/2+5%
Why is Armor 34 Pro Pulse better than Camon 40 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 10,600 mAh2×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · Camon 40 Pro 4G: Yes
- 5GNo · Camon 40 Pro 4G: Yes
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 825 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 32.7 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 183.1 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 86.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 600,062 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 10,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
