- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro vs Phone X23
Tecno Camon 20 Pro vs Volla Phone X23
What Camon 20 Pro does better (13) and where Phone X23 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display3.8
6.4Camera6.4
6.0Battery6.3
4.2Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 ProPhone X23
| Camon 20 Pro | Phone X23 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 160.9 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 80 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 12.2 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 270 g | −80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Phone X23?
- OLED panelYes · Phone X23: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- Weight190 g vs 270 g+42%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 282 ppi+40%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.1″+9%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 12.2 mm+56%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Phone X23 better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Wireless chargingNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 550 nits+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 270 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 12.2 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,560 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 282 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 550 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 69.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 574,290 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, light, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Volla OS, Ubuntu Touch |
| Platform | Android | Other |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
