- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro vs Phone X23
Tecno Camon 20 Pro vs Volla Phone X23
What Camon 20 Pro does better (13) and where Phone X23 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display3.8
6.4Camera6.4
6.0Battery6.3
4.2Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 ProPhone X23
| Camon 20 Pro | Phone X23 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 160.9 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 80 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 12.2 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 270 g | −80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Phone X23?
- OLED panelYes · Phone X23: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
- Weight190 g vs 270 g+42%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 282 ppi+40%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.1″+9%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 12.2 mm+56%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Phone X23 better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Wireless chargingNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 550 nits+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 270 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 12.2 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,560 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 282 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 550 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 69.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 574,290 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, light, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Volla OS, Ubuntu Touch |
| Platform | Android | Other |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15vsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6
vs
Tecno Camon 40 ProvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
8.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Tecno Camon 20 ProvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6


