- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro vs Power Armor X11
Tecno Camon 20 Pro vs UleFone Power Armor X11
What Camon 20 Pro does better (19) and where Power Armor X11 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display2.8
6.4Camera3.1
6.0Battery9.3
4.2Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 ProPower Armor X11
| Camon 20 Pro | Power Armor X11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 158.2 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76.7 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 19.3 mm | −11.5 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 330 g | −140 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Power Armor X11?
- Main camera64 MP vs 16 MP4×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 32 GB8×
- OLED panelYes · Power Armor X11: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Power Armor X11: No
- Weight190 g vs 330 g+74%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 32 GB8×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP6.4×
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 19.3 mm2.5×
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 295 ppi+34%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 5.4″+22%
Why is Power Armor X11 better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 8,150 mAh+63%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 330 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 19.3 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 5.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,440 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 295 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 63.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 574,290 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 8,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15vsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6
vs
Tecno Camon 40 ProvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
8.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Tecno Camon 20 ProvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6