- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 30+ vs Camon 19 Pro
TCL 30+ vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro
What 30+ does better (6) and where Camon 19 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display6.1
5.2Camera8.2
5.8Battery6.0
4.3Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
30+Camon 19 Pro
| 30+ | Camon 19 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.5 mm | 166.8 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 204 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 30+ better than Camon 19 Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Camon 19 Pro: No
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 480 nits+88%
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 19 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+12%
- Weight184 g vs 204 g+11%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.6 mm+12%
Why is Camon 19 Pro better than 30+?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 30+: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · 30+: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.5 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Tech Black, Muse Blue | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 480 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 479 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 88.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 348,546 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,734 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 326 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,010 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Tecno Camon 20 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.66.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A23 5GvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.66.4
vs
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5GvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
7.96.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 ProvsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.36.4
vs
Infinix Note 12 G96vsTecno Camon 19 Pro
6.36.4
vs
Tecno Camon 19 ProvsInfinix Note 12 (2023)
6.46.4


