- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Aquos sense8 vs Camon 30
Sharp Aquos sense8 vs Tecno Camon 30
What Aquos sense8 does better (10) and where Camon 30 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display8.6
8.0Camera7.8
4.6Battery7.3
8.7Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos sense8Camon 30
| Aquos sense8 | Camon 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 153 mm | 165.3 mm | −12.3 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 75.3 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 159 g | 198 g | −38 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos sense8 better than Camon 30?
- 5GYes · Camon 30: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 8 GB32×
- Weight159 g vs 198 g+24%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 30: No
- Pixel density422 ppi vs 393 ppi+7%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Camon 30 better than Aquos sense8?
- Wired charging18 W vs 70 W3.9×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
- Screen size6.1″ vs 6.8″+11%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 7.7 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.1% vs 88.3%+5%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 159 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 153 mm | 165.3 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Aluminium | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP6X | — |
| Colours | Black, Green, Copper | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IGZO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 422 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 88.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 591,209 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,976 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
