- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs T1 5G
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Vivo T1 5G
What Galaxy XCover6 Pro does better (6) and where T1 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display6.7
6.7Camera5.6
3.0Battery4.6
8.4Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy XCover6 ProT1 5G
| Galaxy XCover6 Pro | T1 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.8 mm | 164 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 75.8 mm | +4.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.3 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Weight | 235 g | 187 g | +48 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than T1 5G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T1 5G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
Why is T1 5G better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,050 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Weight235 g vs 187 g+26%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 8.3 mm+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio77.8% vs 83.9%+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 235 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 168.8 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black | Starlight Black, Rainbow Fantasy |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 493 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.8% | 83.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MC2 - Indonesia |
| AnTuTu score | 697,431 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,842 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,050 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.48 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.0 | Funtouch 12 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro
6.86.8
vs
Apple iPhone SE (2022)vsSamsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
6.66.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 ProvsInfinix Note 12 Pro 5G
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 ProvsTecno Pova 4 Pro
6.86.9
vs
Vivo T1 5GvsInfinix Note 12
6.86.7
vs
Vivo T3vsVivo T1 5G
7.86.8

