dotrising.com
Compare
Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Pova 3

Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Tecno Pova 3

What Galaxy XCover6 Pro does better (17) and where Pova 3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2022Galaxy XCover6 Pro

6.8Score

17 advantages≈ $155

Higher score

Tecno · 2022Pova 3

6.0Score

7 advantages≈ $160

5.8Display5.2

5.2Performance2.5

6.7Camera4.6

3.0Battery8.3

8.4Features5.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy XCover6 ProPova 3

	Galaxy XCover6 Pro	Pova 3	Difference
Height	168.8 mm	173.1 mm	−4.3 mm
Width	79.9 mm	78.5 mm	+1.4 mm
Thickness	9.9 mm	9.4 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	235 g	230 g	+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than Pova 3?

AnTuTu score697,431 vs 336,6342.1×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,842 vs 1,3752.1×
5GYes · Pova 3: No
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
Charged in 30 min70% vs 30%2.3×
Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 3: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
Peak brightness500 nits vs 450 nits+11%

Why is Pova 3 better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?

Battery capacity4,050 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+73%
Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy XCover6 Pro: Yes
Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
Weight235 g vs 230 g+2%
Screen-to-body ratio77.8% vs 83.2%+7%
Thickness9.9 mm vs 9.4 mm+5%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro≈ $1556.8	Tecno Pova 3≈ $1606.0
Design
Weight	235 g	230 g
Thickness	9.9 mm	9.4 mm
Height	168.8 mm	173.1 mm
Width	79.9 mm	78.5 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Black	Electric Blue, Tech Silver, Eco Black
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.9″
Panel	PLS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,408 px	2,460 px
Pixel density	400 ppi	389 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	450 nits
Measured brightness	493 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	77.8%	83.2%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G	Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 642L	Mali-G52 MC2
AnTuTu score	697,431	336,634
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,842	1,375
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	181
Memory
RAM	6 GB	6 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	64 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	eMMC 5.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/2.76"	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	13 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,050 mAh	7,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	25 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	70%	30%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.2	5
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	1.48 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 12	Android 11
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8.0	HiOS 12