- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S26 vs V70
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Vivo V70
What Galaxy S26 does better (16) and where V70 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.1
9.1Performance7.7
9.2Camera9.4
5.4Battery9.2
9.7Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S26V70
| Galaxy S26 | V70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149.6 mm | 157.5 mm | −7.9 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 74.3 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 187 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S26 better than V70?
- AnTuTu score2,441,481 vs 1,183,6172.1×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,824 vs 4,0952.6×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme7,230 vs 2,0983.4×
- Wireless chargingYes · V70: No
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 4+75%
- CPU frequency4.74 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+69%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Drop resistance classA vs C
- Weight167 g vs 187 g+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
Why is V70 better than Galaxy S26?
- Wired charging25 W vs 90 W3.6×
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+51%
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 5,000 nits+92%
- Active use (test)15.3 h vs 16.9 h+10%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Measured brightness1,383 nits vs 1,966 nits+42%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 459 ppi+12%
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.6″+5%
- Endurance per cycle51 h vs 65 h+28%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Loudspeaker loudness-26.7 LUFS vs -24.6 LUFS+-8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 149.6 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Schott Xensation Core |
| Colours | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold | Golden Hour, Alpine Gray (Sand Beige), Sandalwood Brown, Canary (Lemon) Yellow, Authentic Black, Passion Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,383 nits | 1,966 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 90.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.74 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,441,481 | 1,183,617 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,824 | 4,095 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230 | 2,098 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4. | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 15.3 h | 16.9 h |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 48% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | -24.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 1.21 W/kg | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | 900 |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | 65 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S25
9.18.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S24
9.18.7
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsSamsung Galaxy S26
9.19.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone (4a) Pro
9.19.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone Pro
9.19.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
9.19.3


