- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S26 vs Pova 8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
What Galaxy S26 does better (15) and where Pova 8 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.6
9.1Performance7.1
9.2Camera8.0
5.4Battery8.4
9.7Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S26Pova 8 Pro
| Galaxy S26 | Pova 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149.6 mm | 162.5 mm | −12.9 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 77.3 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 189 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S26 better than Pova 8 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,441,481 vs 994,6462.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,824 vs 3,2003.4×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Pova 8 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Pova 8 Pro: No
- CPU frequency4.74 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+82%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Pova 8 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Pova 8 Pro: No
- Weight167 g vs 189 g+13%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Pova 8 Pro better than Galaxy S26?
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+51%
- Wired charging25 W vs 45 W+80%
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 4,500 nits+73%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S26: Yes
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 30 W2×
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+8%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 429 ppi+4%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 13 MP+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 149.6 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold | Arc White, Graphite Black, Tundra Green, Tonino Lamborghini Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,383 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.74 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,441,481 | 994,646 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,824 | 3,200 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4. | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.21 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S25
9.18.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S24
9.18.7
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsSamsung Galaxy S26
9.19.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone (4a) Pro
9.19.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone Pro
9.19.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
9.19.3


