- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S26 vs Camon 50 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What Galaxy S26 does better (15) and where Camon 50 Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.5
9.1Performance6.6
9.2Camera9.1
5.4Battery8.5
9.7Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S26Camon 50 Ultra
| Galaxy S26 | Camon 50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149.6 mm | 162.4 mm | −12.8 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 77 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 178 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S26 better than Camon 50 Ultra?
- AnTuTu score2,441,481 vs 804,8753×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,824 vs 3,1343.5×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme7,230 vs 1,0506.9×
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 32.3×
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 50 Ultra: No
- CPU frequency4.74 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+82%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Weight167 g vs 178 g+7%
- Measured brightness1,383 nits vs 1,302 nits+6%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
Why is Camon 50 Ultra better than Galaxy S26?
- Wired charging25 W vs 45 W+80%
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 6,160 mAh+43%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Active use (test)15.3 h vs 16 h+5%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+8%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 429 ppi+4%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
- Loudspeaker loudness-26.7 LUFS vs -25.4 LUFS+-5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 149.6 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Luminous Orange, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,383 nits | 1,302 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.74 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,441,481 | 804,875 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,824 | 3,134 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230 | 1,050 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4. | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 6,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.3 h | 16 h |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 42% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.21 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S25
9.18.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S24
9.18.7
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsSamsung Galaxy S26
9.19.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone (4a) Pro
9.19.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone Pro
9.19.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
9.19.3