- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S26 vs Aquos R11
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Sharp Aquos R11
What Galaxy S26 does better (11) and where Aquos R11 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display8.6
9.2Camera9.2
5.4Battery7.5
9.7Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S26Aquos R11
| Galaxy S26 | Aquos R11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149.6 mm | 156 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 74 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 195 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S26 better than Aquos R11?
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 32.3×
- Wireless chargingYes · Aquos R11: No
- CPU frequency4.74 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+48%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R11: No
- Weight167 g vs 195 g+17%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 396 ppi+4%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+24%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Aquos R11 better than Galaxy S26?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+19%
- Wired charging25 W vs 36 W+44%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 3,600 nits+38%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 149.6 mm | 156 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold | Navy, Ivory, Terracotta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 3,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,383 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.74 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,441,481 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,824 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4. | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 15.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 36 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.21 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S25
9.18.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S24
9.18.7
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsSamsung Galaxy S26
9.19.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone (4a) Pro
9.19.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone Pro
9.19.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
9.19.3


