dotrising.com
Compare
Galaxy S24 FE vs Y200 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Vivo Y200 Pro

What Galaxy S24 FE does better (20) and where Y200 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24 FE

8.8Score

20 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

Vivo · 2024Y200 Pro

7.3Score

7 advantages≈ $300

8.1Display8.3

7.8Performance4.6

9.3Camera7.7

3.8Battery6.5

9.8Features4.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S24 FEY200 Pro

	Galaxy S24 FE	Y200 Pro	Difference
Height	162 mm	164.4 mm	−2.4 mm
Width	77.3 mm	74.9 mm	+2.4 mm
Thickness	8 mm	7.5 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	213 g	172 g	+41 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than Y200 Pro?

AnTuTu score1,548,896 vs 561,5752.8×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,299 vs 2,2012.9×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Telephoto cameraYes · Y200 Pro: No
Wireless chargingYes · Y200 Pro: No
NFCYes · Y200 Pro: No
Stereo speakersYes · Y200 Pro: No
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 1,300 nits+46%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+41%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200 Pro: No

Why is Y200 Pro better than Galaxy S24 FE?

Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+6%
Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Weight213 g vs 172 g+24%
Selfie camera10 MP vs 16 MP+60%
Thickness8 mm vs 7.5 mm+7%
Screen-to-body ratio88% vs 90.1%+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE≈ $3008.8	Vivo Y200 Pro≈ $3007.3
Design
Weight	213 g	172 g
Thickness	8 mm	7.5 mm
Height	162 mm	164.4 mm
Width	77.3 mm	74.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow	Silk black, Silk green
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	388 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,300 nits
Measured brightness	1,372 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	88%	90.1%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2400e	Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	10	8
CPU frequency	3.1 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 940	Adreno 619
AnTuTu score	1,548,896	561,575
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,299	2,201
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,889	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	—
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	1080p
4K video frame rate	120 fps	—
Selfie camera	10 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.8 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	44 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.1
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.86 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	Funtouch 14
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	42 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—