dotrising.com
Compare
Galaxy S24 FE vs Y200 GT

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Vivo Y200 GT

What Galaxy S24 FE does better (14) and where Y200 GT wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24 FE

8.8Score

14 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

Vivo · 2024Y200 GT

8.8Score

10 advantages≈ $250

8.1Display9.7

9.3Camera6.1

3.8Battery8.9

9.8Features7.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S24 FEY200 GT

	Galaxy S24 FE	Y200 GT	Difference
Height	162 mm	163.7 mm	−1.7 mm
Width	77.3 mm	75.9 mm	+1.4 mm
Thickness	8 mm	8 mm	=
Weight	213 g	195 g	+18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than Y200 GT?

Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Optical stabilisationYes · Y200 GT: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Y200 GT: No
Wireless chargingYes · Y200 GT: No
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200 GT: No
Max video8K vs 4K
4K selfie videoYes · Y200 GT: No
eSIMYes · Y200 GT: No
CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+18%
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%

Why is Y200 GT better than Galaxy S24 FE?

Wired charging25 W vs 80 W3.2×
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 4,500 nits2.4×
Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+28%
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Pixel density385 ppi vs 453 ppi+18%
Weight213 g vs 195 g+9%
Selfie camera10 MP vs 16 MP+60%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Charged in 30 min50% vs 58%+16%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE≈ $3008.8	Vivo Y200 GT≈ $2508.8
Design
Weight	213 g	195 g
Thickness	8 mm	8 mm
Height	162 mm	163.7 mm
Width	77.3 mm	75.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow	Black, Blue
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	453 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,372 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	88%	89.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2400e	Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	10	8
CPU frequency	3.1 GHz	2.63 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 940	Adreno 720
AnTuTu score	1,548,896	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,299	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,889	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	10 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	—
Active use (test)	11.8 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	58%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.86 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	OriginOS 4
Major OS updates promised	7	—
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	42 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—