- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S24 FE vs T909
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Tel.Me. T909
What Galaxy S24 FE does better (7) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
8.1Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S24 FET909
| Galaxy S24 FE | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162 mm | 109 mm | +53 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 44 mm | +33.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 22 mm | −14 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 95 g | +118 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than T909?
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 600 mAh7.8×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness8 mm vs 22 mm2.8×
- eSIMYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Galaxy S24 FE?
- Weight213 g vs 95 g2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 162 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | — |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | — |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,900 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,372 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 2400e | — |
| Chip maker | Exynos | — |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 10 | — |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | — |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 1,548,896 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,299 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,889 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 8K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 11.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | — |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | — |
| SAR (head) | 0.86 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | One UI 9 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 42 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S24 FE
8.98.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsInfinix GT 20 Pro
8.88.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S23 FE
8.88.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsMotorola Edge 50
8.88.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsXiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
8.89.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsTecno Camon 30 Pro
8.88.7